Covid-19 airborne threat is ‘serious’

Content image - Phnom Penh Post
Medical staff seal a vent in what used to be an isolation ward for patients infected by the COVID-19 coronavirus at a hospital in Wuhan, China. AFP/File

As countries ease their lockdowns, authorities need to recognise that the novel coronavirus can spread through the air far beyond the 2m urged in social distancing guidelines, an international group of 239 scientists said on Monday.

In a commentary that takes direct aim at the World Health Organisation (WHO)for its reluctance to update its advice, researchers recommended new measures including increasing indoor ventilation, installing high-grade air filters and UV lamps, and preventing overcrowding in buildings and transport.

The authors, led by Lidia Morawska of the Queensland University of Technology wrote: “There is significant potential for inhalation exposure to viruses in microscopic respiratory droplets [microdroplets] at short to medium distances [up to several metres, or room scale].

“Hand washing and social distancing are appropriate, but in our view, insufficient to protect virus-carrying respiratory microdroplets released into the air by infected people.”

The new paper appears in the Oxford Academic journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.

When an infected person breathes, speaks, coughs or sneezes, he expels droplets of various sizes.

Those above five to 10 micrometers – which is less than the width of a typical human hair – fall to the ground in seconds and within a metre or two.

Droplets under this size can become suspended in the air in what is called an “aerosol”, remaining aloft for several hours and traveling up to tens of meters.

There has been a debate in the scientific community about how infectious microdroplets are in the context of Covid-19.

For the time being the WHO advises that the potential for infection from an aerosol occurs “in specific circumstances” mainly in hospitals, for example when a tube is placed down a patient’s airway.

On the other hand, some studies of particular spreading events suggest that aerosolisation and microdroplet transmission can happen in a variety of settings.

The air flow from an air conditioning unit appeared to waft the coronavirus to several tables in a Chinese restaurant in January where patrons became infected, said a study that appeared in Emerging Infectious Diseases.

Another study that appeared in a report by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention found that the virus was spread by microdroplets from people singing during a choir practice in the US state of Washington in March. Fifty-three people fell ill at that event and two died.

That is in addition to the fact that bars jam-packed with people have also emerged as hotspots of contagion, with droplets of all sizes believed to contribute to the spread.

Cath Noakes, a professor of environmental engineering for buildings at the University of Leeds, who contributed to the paper, said Covid-19 doesn’t spread in the air as easily as measles or tuberculosis, but is a threat nonetheless.

“Covid-19 is more likely to be ‘opportunistically’ airborne and therefore poses a risk to people who are in the same room for long periods,” she said.

In response to the commentary, the WHO said: “We are aware of the article and are reviewing its contents with our technical experts.”

The authors recognised that evidence for microdroplet transmission was “admittedly incomplete”, but argued that the evidence for large droplets and surface transmission was also incomplete, yet they still formed the basis for health guidelines.

“Following the precautionary principle, we must address every potentially important pathway to slow the spread of Covid-19,” they wrote.

Put another way, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence,” said Julian Tang, an associate professor of respiratory sciences at the University of Leicester who also contributed to the commentary.

“The WHO says that there is insufficient evidence to prove aerosol/airborne transmission of Sars-CoV-2 is happening. We are arguing that there is insufficient proof that aerosol/airborne transmission does not occur,” he said.